Today we will be looking at everything that is left in the set: Mana and utility cards. Mana is easy to define: is it a land? Does it produce some kind of mana? Done. Utility is somewhat more fluid. Utility expands the functionality of your deck. Adding resources, adding new angles of attack, engines, etc.
This is the home stretch so let's get right to it.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e267/3e267727a4f1a38d0601c35fdf5681b6d93a5ca8" alt="Spirit Bonds"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/66da7/66da7dbbcf8d0649662ef72b06520b7ec21778e7" alt="Chief Engineer"
Now, with that in mind: Chief Engineer is less explosive. It doesn't generate as much mana per Creature. This is balanced by the fact that you can use any and all of your Creatures for mana. So I would guess that this is somewhat worse than Grand Architect, but still worth looking into.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5926/c5926d3a5c942e4b3502ccfe067244febbd33d94" alt="Military Intelligence"
I don't necessarily see this being the most useful in a mono Blue linear strategy. Instead, I see uses for this in aggro-control decks like Edric. Bant based token swarm decks may also have a spot for this. I think this is worth trying out, but I wouldn't be surprised if it ends up getting cut for something better.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3324f/3324f6c30bb89c9666ab662100e7b134ec287012" alt="Necromancer’s Stockpile"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c761f/c761ffbf0a5e727ff710fa5ed15cab391eeddd66" alt="Waste Not"
No matter what they pitch you get some kind of value, but the key to making this card successful is going to be how you leverage the second ability. Many players are going to want to discard lands so that they can hold onto their action spells, but if you have some sort of mana sink like say, a Scepter of Fugue, then you can really put that extra mana to a good use.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7850e/7850e4f606d7e5938733d4d540fff0981ae6ff07" alt="Act on Impulse"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3c05/b3c05cdd4bd5826fd089b6df1c4d1a5883ccdb82" alt="Aggressive Mining"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fdc1/7fdc132604076aed5b56b7d0cefd9abb320253b7" alt="Avarice Amulet"
This card will create an interesting interplay in deckbuilding because you want to be certain that you have more removal than your opponent, but you also need to find room for the Creature to put this on.
I can't hate on this too hard because I am die hard fan of Penny Arcade. I have been reading it since the beginning and I won't stop until they do. However, having seen them play Magic, they are definitely funny...
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59d9a/59d9a27a79daddcc25245eba52ce125807257e62" alt="Sliver Hive"
The line we were given to justify changing the look of slivers was that they were too difficult to differentiate in art. They all just looked like a sliver doing a thing, instead of a sliver that COULD do a thing. Or whatever.
My first problem with this is: if that were true, how does making them look like the Predator solve that? The 2014 slivers all looked the same too. I never looked at the art on a sliver card and thought to myself 'wow, that humanoid body shape really helped convey they differences between this sliver and EVERY OTHER ONE THAT LOOKED LIKE IT!'
This would be a problem, but the point of slivers is that each one adds something to the collective, resulting in them all being IDENTICAL. They are supposed to look alike, right? They literally make each other more similar. I guess the main takeaway we are getting from this sliver fiasco is that slivers can be anything they want to be when they grow up...including the same thing they always were.
Thanks to the design team for press fitting in an overused hook into a set that was already overflowing with hooks. I am not sure whether this is the best core set ever or the worst, but it has accomplished some very important goals:
- It provides a stable footing for new players to learn the game. Using a simplified rules set and obvious references to the previous core sets in Aaron Forsythe's tenure as head of R&D (M10 and forward), Wizards has created a pristine environment for learning and exploration within the game.
- It resonates with long time players by calling back to popular mechanics and themes that veterans can appreciate.
- It successfully launches a merger between the Pro Tour and the release of core sets. This set is complex and interesting enough for us to WANT to watch the pros play it, and it should provide a great show.
- M15 adds a wealth of new, highly competitve cards. The power level of the set is quite high, ensuring that players who invest heavily in this set will be able to use their cards, even at top level tournaments.
- Lastly, and perhaps most importantly for the designers, this set has MASS appeal and is going to sell like hot cakes. I wouldn't be too surprised to find out that this was the highest selling core set of all time. The marketing tie-ins were all there: Pro Tour exposure, slivers, high-profile cycles, the Garruk ad campaign, Duels of the Planeswalkers, outside designers, You Make the Card, and the return of pain lands! This set has just about everything that you could want and it caps off a summer that has been absolutely huge for the game.
That is all for us here at TGZ. Magic 2015 is sweet. No doubt about it. The time has come to stop talking about the cards and start playing with them. If you attended prerelease events in your area, you have already gotten your hands on the set.
As always, we appreciate your support and your feedback, so feel free to drop us a line in the comments to talk about the cards, the review, the future, or anything else.
-GG
No comments:
Post a Comment